"My Evolutionary Kiwi Tree"

I have a one-of-a-kind Evolutionary Kiwi Tree!  On my tree it bears Kiwi fruit, each day I pick a Kiwi fruit, open it up and look inside.  One day, much to my surprise, I found bird DNA inside the fruit of my Kiwi tree.  The bird DNA was a small embryo of a partially formed baby bird, formed INSIDE the Kiwi fruit. 

This is a once-in-a-lifetime find, really a one in 35 million years find, so I threw it away into the trash, never to be discovered!  I threw back Evolutionary Science (oxymoron) 35 million years!  Sorry, haha!  Evolutionary Science will have to wait ANOTHER 35 millions years for a find like this to naturally occur again.

Of course in the fruit of the upper branches, in the kiwi fruit tree, you would expect to find DNA from birds, squirrels, pterodactyl's, bats, etc.  In the mid branches, the fruit would contain DNA from monkeys, cats, raccoons, and the like.  The lower branches would contain kiwi's containing DNA from snakes, rats, crocodiles, marmots, Hippo's, deer, elk, moose, bears, T-Rex, brontosauraus, etc. 

But this is all the Second - Evolution, the Second Evolution is where plants, trees, flora existed First before the animal kingdom; where the animals came FROM.  This worked because the animals NEED the flora to eat.  If there were no plants, shrubs and trees for the animals to eat, then the animals would have died off.

The First Evolution is when the animals were formed from the earth Before flora existed; these poor animals soon died off because there was nothing to eat. The First Evolution ended quickly, but they did have just enough time to build the Pyramids of Giza which are in a desert anyway.

In the Second Evolution, the trees produced fruit that contained animal life which also dropped into ponds, rivers, lake and streams; some of which eventually lead to the oceans.  The Oceans were populated by the Second Evolution. The Second Evolution was spectacular with Dinosaurs fighting, battling, devouring plant eaters and meat eaters like giant gladiators.  

In order to build up Earth's oil reserves, all dinosaurs were ordered at age 65 to retire in Saudi Arabia, where each lived a few more years then died there.  Over the years the smell was pretty bad with the exposed, decaying body heap.  The heap must have risen over 900 meters up; most died while climbing to the top.  Of course only the plant-eater dinosaurs were invited, you wouldn't want the meat-eaters eating the pile before it becomes oil, this would be counterproductive. I imagine that the early dinosaurs had it easier just dying in a pile but the later ones had a more difficult climb.

We all know that when animals die, they decay; insects and carnivores devour the carcass, it dries up then only the bones are left as we can see in deserts, canyons, farmland, prairies, ranches, crime scenes, shallow graves and missing persons cases.  These were all staged of course, because instead we are told from so called "evolutionary" scientists, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary chemists, evolutionary geologists, evolutionary Darwinists, etc. that animals don't decay, but instead turn into oil.

I wonder why, when people crack open a rock, there is an imprint of a plant inside or even an animal; the rock AND the imprint itself IS a rock.  I wonder where the oil is, maybe they need to invent a new word, maybe this should be called dry-oil?  I am the first to use it; I patent it!  Likewise, on the bottoms of oil reservoirs, I imagine there is a vast pile of bones and teeth and tusks that didn't turn into oil because after all, oil comes from rotting, decaying flesh, not from bones, teeth, claws, horns, tusks, etc.  You will know when an oil reservoir is getting low when the pumps get clogged with bones, teeth, claws, horns and tusks that are at the bottom.

Another so called fossil fuel is coal.  Where did coal come from?  Did the oil dry out and become soft rock? This is what they taught in middle school, because middle schoolers aren't sophisticated enough to question fake facts.  This is why this "science" isn't taught in high school because high schoolers would ask tough questions and be much more skeptical; the lies would become exposed.

Natural gas is another so-called fossil fuel.  Let's do a scientific experiment. Lets get a 50 gallon drum and fill it with oil.  Let's capture the fumes; what are the chances the fumes would be natural gas?  Anyone willing to take this bet?  No, none; because we aren't in middle school any more!

Ok, hold on, one more!  Liquid propane, the last of the so called fossil fuels.  Propane is a gas that is turned into a liquid for storage and transport.  When we use it in our BBQ grill's or "gas" fire pit, it is converted back into "gas".  Where did propane come from?  Did the coal get wet and dissolve or did natural gas turn into a liquid?  

The outcast dinosaurs, the meat-eaters, instead went to die in Russia, Alaska, China, Venezuela, etc; this is why Saudi Arabia doesn't have ALL the oil, but some other countries also have oil.  A heartfelt "Thank You!" to all the outcast dinosaurs out there, so that we aren't so dependent on Saudi Arabia's oil alone.

The oil reserves of today were measured at around 900 meters deep (in the 1970's) and today it is estimated to be only around 20 meters left and running lower each day.  That's ok, we have battery power now, so we don't need outdated, antiquated, dirty dinosaur power.  The Second Evolution ended with the death of all living land anmals and the cover of the dinosaur heap. Huge asteroids hit the earth and large volcanoes erupted, this buried the flesh of the rotting donosaur heap so that it can slowly ferment over billions of years. 

The Second Evolution, gave birth to the Third Evolution. The Third Evolution is where the ocean life came to the shore's, sprouted legs, lungs and walked from the oceans to the land. All life that we know today came from the Third Evolution.  This is why we like to swim; it is innate, in our blood, natural, back to our roots.  You have seen videos of a baby in a swimming pool, looks really natural, he/she wasn't taught or took lessons on how to swim but there they are holding their breath and breathing where appropriate. 

Think about it, we all were in our mother's wombs breathing saline water for nine months. When we were born the doctor slapped us, then we transitioned from water breathing to air breathing, in a second.  The same is true with the Third Evolution, in a second, when the sea life slapped up onto the shoreline, they suddenly breathed air, then walked onto the land; the first life on land for the third time.

This is all from "scientific" evolution, Evolutionary Science, Evolutionary Geology, Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Chemistry and Evolutionary Darwinism.  After all you got straight "A's" in these subjects, so how can an "A" be wrong?  A grade of an "A" by definition means exactly correct, not wrong at all.  What it really means is, if the teacher teaches a lie and you believe it and regurgitate it enough, then you get an A.  This doesn't make a lie the truth. 

This doesn't mean that you are educated and correct on the subject, it just means you were rewarded for not questioning the false "facts" (lies) because they kept repeating "...science says...science says...." over and over again.  This is just a cheap bullying technique, kind of like repeating: obviously or everyone knows or everyone agrees or "its proven that" or stating a theory as fact because the theory was made a long time ago.  If a long time has passed and a theory still hasn't been proven, then it is actually disproven, because in all that time no one could substantiate the theory. 

Buy yourself a fruit tree, an orchard, a forest or a vegetable garden and watch the bountiful harvest that it produces: animal life!

*******************************************************************************************************

OK, I made my above points with sarcasm, now let me clarify and explain without sarcasm.

********************************************************************************************************

I am Not anti-science, in fact I have a bachelor's in Computer Science and I have been working in a science field for many decades.  There is nothing wrong with the pure science part of Biology, Chemistry, Geology, Darwin's Adaptation and Variation, Psychology, Sociology, History, Anthropology, etc. 

But science becomes corrupt when teachers, professors choose to inject their NON FACTUAL OPINIONS about evolution, bigfoot, space beings, ghosts, Nesse, curses, potions, etc. INTO the coursework.  When they mix in the non-factual with the factual, the truth, the science, becomes blurred. 

No real scientist can definitely answer the origins of oil, natural gas, coal or propane; they can only observe that they exist. The fake scientists will readily come up with all kinds of answers (always, always based only on theories, no controlled laboratory experiments).  When comparing the answers from the false scientists, the answers are nothing more than opinions, biases, and they contradict eachother; REAL science isn't opinions, biases or contradictions. 

REAL scientists make controlled experiments in laboratories to test out a theory, if the experiment fails then the theory fails.  REAL scientists control the initial conditions, the input, the ingredients, then they have a process, then there is a result or output; they strive for cause and effect.  Cause and effect are proof, it is a repeated, duplicable process; this is REAL science. Liars can theorize all day long but it is just worthless rhetoric; proof is science; no proof, no science.

Real science and can not create oil, coal, natural gas, propane, fossiles, pertified trees, etc.; we can only observe that these exist on Earth.  Fake science can theorize all day long as to where these come from, with unscientific opinions, biases and fase assumptions that all contradict eachother.

The teachers make the questions on the homework, quizzes and tests; the students are motivated to get a good grade, so they answer the biased questions with the teacher's biased content.  The students are not motivated to disagree or have a confrontation with the professor.  They answer what they were taught; they are forced against their better sense to give the answer that the professor is expecting.

So how can we change this?  What can we do?  We have to break the cycle of the wrong order.  Here is the typical order:  we apply at accredited colleges for the degree that we want, we get accepted, we pick the final college, we attend class, the professor opens his mouth and the rhetoric spill out.  At this point IT'S TOO late.  There isn't time to drop the class or switch colleges, besides it could happen all over again at the next class or next college.

To break this broken cycle, you have to FIRST find out the credentials of the school, dean and professors for your major. You have to ASK what are their credentials BEFORE you put the school on the list to apply to.  You need a better answer than, "I have a Phd from Xyz University".  This doesn't tell us anything, of course they do, they ALL have this credential in common. 

What you need to find out is if the professor's degree (their coursework, the professors who taught them, their research, their studies, their homework, their thesis, their dissertation) were based on non-scientific, opinions, biases of the evolution rhetoric, which blurred and corrupted the pure science part of their scientific field of study.

You need to find out if the teacher is corrupted by these biases in their qualifications, coursework, degree, and credentials.  If the teacher is corrupt, then their teachings will be corrupt.  You will be taught corruption, bias, non-scientific opinions that are presented as "facts".  Find out ahead of time and BREAK THE CYCLE.

Perhaps the professor shamefully admits that he/she was taught Evolution and his / her credentails are largely based on evolutionary biases, opinions and non-factual evidence; but prehaps they attest to NOT teach their classes with these biases; this is acceptable too.  We don't want to brand, label, shun or bully professors who otherwise are willing to exclude these biases from their teachings.

Perhaps if enough students ask these questons, of their prospective schools and professors, then their would be a school website listing whether the professor adhears to evolutionary teachings or whether it will be excluded from their classes.  This will make choosing a college and major a lot easier; but until we get there do your "homework" and ask these questions before choosing a college.

Think of the effort and diligence that we use on a daily basis for small purchases.  We check sales, coupons, specials, reviews, warranties and Yelp for our purchases of smart phones, tablets, pc's, laptops, tv's, restaurants, movies, etc.  These costs are minuscule compared to the college cost of $30,000 - $60,000 per year plus compounded interest!!

Its imperative that we apply this diligence when choosing a college, major or a class/professor!!